Trump Proposes to Remove the CHIPS Act, Calls It a “Horrible” Thing

May Be Interested In:Women’s March Madness: After JuJu Watkins’ injury, Kiki Iriafen and Trojans power USC to Sweet 16


  • In a speech on Tuesday, Trump criticized the CHIPS act and called for it to be removed. 
  • He wants the remaining money to be put to some good use, such as clearing off some of the US’s debt.
  • However, as per inside sources, there’s no real threat to the act yet. It’s not going anywhere. 

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump said that the US should get rid of the 2022 CHIPS act that gave a $52.7 billion subsidy to semiconductor manufacturers. He called it a “horrible, horrible thing”. 

We give hundreds of billions of dollars and it doesn’t mean a thing. They take our money and they don’t spend it. – Trump

Trump told House Speaker Mike Johnson to get rid of it immediately and use the remaining money (approximately $36 billion has already been paid out) for something fruitful such as paying off debts.

However, as per inside sources, this is still just Trump’s personal feelings and not an official decision. There’s no political basis to remove the act yet. In fact, in the current budget proposal as well, there was no sign of the act being in danger. 

What Is the CHIPS Act?

The CHIPS Act was introduced by Joe Biden in 2022. While the world was slowly coming out of the two-year pandemic and lockdown, the US was hit by a massive chip crisis. That’s because the country was heavily reliant on foreign countries for chip imports

So Biden decided to incentivize chip manufacturing to boost domestic production. This is what Trump wants as well – to boost production within the US borders and to reduce reliance on other countries. But he has an issue with the approach.  

For instance, he worries that this act will benefit China indirectly because some of the companies receiving the funds have ties with China. He also has a problem with big corporations, which are already making a substantial profit, and benefitting from this scheme. 

Most importantly, he is worried that while the act was a step in the right direction, it was not enough to boost domestic production. There needs to be a more rigid framework to ensure that the beneficiary companies are actually using the money to give back to the US. 

Is Dumping the CHIPS Act a Legit Solution?

Trump’s concerns are certainly valid but removing the act out of nowhere might not be the best way to handle it. For instance, companies like Intel have secured $7.86B from the CHIPS Act for its semiconductor manufacturing projects in Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oregon.

Clearly, the Act has helped speed up the chips shortage in the face of growing demand for AI. A better solution can be to resolve the issues within the act. 

For starters, Trump’s administration can create a tighter framework around who benefits from the scheme. Companies that are already financially stable or those who have ties with China can be excluded. 

Similarly, they can also create a set of guidelines that each company will have to follow if they want to benefit from this scheme. For example, they can direct companies to make their supply chain 100% US-based and to hire more local talent to boost employment.

The ultimate goal is to make the US independent in terms of technology and the CHIPS act is a great tool for that. All that it needs is better execution and a little more control.

Add Techreport to Your Google News Feed

Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now!

Subscribe now

Alpa Somaiya

Alpa is a senior editor with a wealth of experience in alternative finance, fintech, cryptocurrency, app security software, and the medical industry. She’s currently an in-house managing editor with the Techreport team.

Alpa is passionate about breaking down complex topics and sharing informative content that provides value.

View all articles by Alpa Somaiya

The Tech Report editorial policy is centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written by real authors.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

'Isse industry se nikalo': Aamir Khan reveals he initially rejected Dangal, thought Shah Rukh, Salman sent Nitesh Tiwari to end his career
Sunita Williams’ Stellar Return: Reclaiming health after 9 months in space
49-member contingent to represent India at Special Olympics World Winter Games
49-member contingent to represent India at Special Olympics World Winter Games
New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.
Most quakes on Mars happen during the summer – and we don’t know why
Tom Brady's ex-teammate, Rob Gronkowski, has defended his broadcasting work
Rob Gronkowski gives verdict on Tom Brady’s tricky first season as NFL analyst after criticism of $375m Fox role
How “Severance” Makes a Fetish of the Office
How “Severance” Makes a Fetish of the Office
Amazon unveils AI-powered Alexa+, not available in Canada yet
Amazon unveils AI-powered Alexa+, not available in Canada yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Around the Globe: Today's Key Headlines | © 2025 | Daily News